UNI 1-0 FCS · 57% REN 1-2 MAR · 58% VEN 1-1 FIO · 57% GEN 1-0 FRO · 57% BOR 3-1 SCP · 67% 189 1-1 VFB · 57% SCF 2-1 BOR · 59% FCA 1-2 BAY · 60% FSV 1-1 EIN · 57% CHE 2-0 HUL · 67% LIV 2-1 FUL · 65% AST 2-1 NOT · 62% BOU 1-1 BRE · 57% CRY 1-0 IPS · 60% UNI 1-0 FCS · 57% REN 1-2 MAR · 58% VEN 1-1 FIO · 57% GEN 1-0 FRO · 57% BOR 3-1 SCP · 67% 189 1-1 VFB · 57% SCF 2-1 BOR · 59% FCA 1-2 BAY · 60% FSV 1-1 EIN · 57% CHE 2-0 HUL · 67% LIV 2-1 FUL · 65% AST 2-1 NOT · 62% BOU 1-1 BRE · 57% CRY 1-0 IPS · 60%
Starligue · Week 2 Sep 11, 2026 · 18:00 Not Started

Chartres
vs
Tremblay.

10 AI models read this match. The plurality on 1X2 leans toward Chartres (5 of 10 models). The mean predicted score (rounded from all models) is 31–29 at 54% mean confidence (Low band) — see the strip and table below.

Who do you think will win?

Vote before kick-off and compare with AI

— Consensus

Where the panel lands.

Vote share across models. Read this strip first, then the line-by-line table.

Chartres win 50%

5 / 10 models

Draw 0%

0 / 10 models

Tremblay win 50%

5 / 10 models

Advertisement
— Model breakdown

10 picks. Receipts attached.

Line-by-line comparison of each system’s call.

#
Model
Pick
Score
Conf.
Reasoning
01
GPT-5.6 Luna
Tremblay win
32–33
48%
Tremblay are unbeaten in the last three meetings, including a win at Chartres and a recent 35-35 draw. Chartres’ home advantage should keep this close, but the head-to-head attacking tempo favors a narrow Tremblay victory.
02
Claude Sonnet 5
Tremblay win
27–29
52%
Recent meetings are tight and high-scoring; Tremblay generally the stronger Starligue side, edging a close away contest.
03
Gemini 3.8 Flash
Chartres win
31–29
56%
Recent head-to-head fixtures consistently produce high-scoring, tight encounters; Chartres hold home-court advantage to narrowly edge Tremblay in an offensive battle.
04
Grok 4.6
Chartres win
31–29
52%
Week 2 Starligue, thin form. Chartres home H2H mixed (30-25 win, 28-34 loss) after 35-35; slight venue edge in a typical ~30-goal game.
05
DeepSeek V4 Pro
Chartres win
31–29
55%
Chartres have won two of their last three home H2Hs, and both teams showed high-scoring attacks in recent meetings; slight home edge points to a narrow win.
06
Qwen 3.8 Max
Tremblay win
29–31
52%
Tremblay won 3 of last 5 H2H including a 34-28 away victory at Chartres; high-scoring pattern consistent across meetings supports a narrow Tremblay edge.
07
Mistral Medium 3.5
Chartres win
30–28
65%
Chartres strong at home in H2H; narrow win likely.
08
Kimi K3
Tremblay win
29–31
48%
Tremblay's stronger recent pedigree and their 34-28 win at Chartres last December give them the edge; H2H totals hover near 60-63 goals.
09
GLM 5.3
Tremblay win
31–32
52%
Tremblay took points from the last two H2H meetings including a 34-28 win at Chartres; these sides trade goals heavily, so a narrow away edge in a high-scoring game fits.
10
MiMo V2.5 Pro
Chartres win
31–27
55%
H2H shows high-scoring close games; Chartres at home has won historically, slight edge over Tremblay in early season.
— Scoreline frequency

How often each scoreline showed up.

3 of 9 models settled on 31–29. The rest of the list shows where dissent still lives before kickoff.

  • 31–29
    3 models
  • 29–31
    2 models
  • 32–33
    1 model
  • 27–29
    1 model
  • 30–28
    1 model
  • 31–27
    1 model

Match overview

Looking for a today prediction on Chartres vs Tremblay in Starligue? TuringStats aggregates multiple AI scorelines into one readable page so you can see who the models favor, the mean predicted score shown in the hero (31 - 29; the frequency chart below lists the most common exact scorelines), and implied splits before kickoff.

This prediction hub is written for readers comparing betting tips-style language with transparent model votes — not a single black-box call. The headline read is Chartres win, with vote shares roughly 50% / 0% / 50% home, draw, and away (rounded).

If you are asking who will win Chartres vs Tremblay, start with the consensus strip and model table, then cross-check form and injuries in Match context further down — that order keeps the strongest signals first.

— Aggregated insights

What’s moving the panel.

01
Consensus favors Chartres

50% of models lean home — the clearest cluster on this fixture before kickoff.

02
Low confidence

Mean 54% across the panel with real dispersion — compare unanimous calls vs split tickets in the model table.

03
xG tilt 30.20 vs 29.80

Derived from predicted scorelines (model means), not live match data — useful for pace vs vote-share sanity checks.

04
Match context

Expected-goals tilt and home-field rhythm (see xG on this page) usually explain whether the game stays open or compresses late.

Confidence trend

Cumulative average confidence in table order.

First model Last model

Explore more

Keep browsing today prediction coverage and league hubs.

Related matches

— Journal

Articles linked to these clubs or AI forecasting.

Advertisement

Ask multiple AIs about this match.

Compare their answers, read the reasoning, and see where they disagree. Try one question free each day.