JUV 1-1 ATA · 58% OFI 1-0 AST · 53% VIB 1-2 FCN · 52% SLA 2-1 PLZ · 59% DEP 1-1 REA · 58% VIL 2-1 LEV · 62% ALM 2-0 CEL · 59% LAS 1-0 BUR · 54% CLU 2-1 GEN · 57% KAL 0-2 PAN · 63% EST 1-1 CAS · 51% SAN 0-1 SCB · 57% AME 0-2 BEş · 61% GöZ 1-0 RIZ · 53% JUV 1-1 ATA · 58% OFI 1-0 AST · 53% VIB 1-2 FCN · 52% SLA 2-1 PLZ · 59% DEP 1-1 REA · 58% VIL 2-1 LEV · 62% ALM 2-0 CEL · 59% LAS 1-0 BUR · 54% CLU 2-1 GEN · 57% KAL 0-2 PAN · 63% EST 1-1 CAS · 51% SAN 0-1 SCB · 57% AME 0-2 BEş · 61% GöZ 1-0 RIZ · 53%
FA Cup · 2nd Round Qualifying Sep 19, 2026 · 14:00 · UTC Match Finished · 90'

Walton & Hersham
vs
Horsham.

Quick answer

Who will win Walton & Hersham vs Horsham?

Final score: Walton & Hersham 0–3 Horsham. Before kickoff, 5 of 10 AI models pick Horsham to win (50%); the consensus was right.

Consensus of independent AI models on TuringStats, updated before kickoff. Not betting advice.

Head-to-head history → Walton & Hersham form Horsham form

10 AI models read this match. The plurality on 1X2 leans toward Horsham (5 of 10 models). The mean predicted score (rounded from all models) is 1–2 at 52% mean confidence (Low band) — see the strip and table below.

Who do you think will win?

Vote before kick-off and compare with AI

10 AI models · council in session Live match data · Pro

Still not sure? Ask 10 AIs at once:
“Will Walton & Hersham beat Horsham in their upcoming match?”

Every model votes yes or no and defends it in a sentence or two. Attach this match's last-5 form, head-to-head and the picks above so they argue from real data — then keep asking the same council follow-ups.

Ask the Council Free today · sign in with Google to convene the council
— Consensus

Where the panel lands.

Vote share across models. Read this strip first, then the line-by-line table.

Walton & Hersham win 40%

4 / 10 models

Draw 10%

1 / 10 models

Horsham win 50%

5 / 10 models

— Model breakdown

10 picks. Receipts attached.

Line-by-line comparison of each system’s call.

#
Model
Pick
Score
Conf.
Reasoning
01
GPT-5.6 Luna
Horsham win
0–2
64%
Horsham appear the stronger side on paper, while Walton & Hersham have home advantage but no supporting form or head-to-head data is available. The cup setting may keep the game controlled, favouring an away clean-sheet win.
02
Claude Sonnet 5
Horsham win
1–2
52%
Horsham typically compete at a higher step than Walton & Hersham, giving them a quality edge despite the away trip in this qualifying round.
03
Gemini 3.8 Flash
Draw
1–1
52%
Two evenly matched Step 3 sides known for competitive cup ties. Walton & Hersham's artificial pitch advantage should be neutralized by Horsham's experienced knockout pedigree, pointing to a tight replay-forcing draw.
04
Grok 4.6
Walton & Hersham win
1–0
42%
No H2H or form data; FA Cup 2nd qualifying at Walton & Hersham. Home edge in a tight non-league tie, low tempo, one-goal home win.
05
DeepSeek V4 Pro
Walton & Hersham win
1–0
48%
FA Cup qualifier between closely matched non-league sides; home advantage and cup tempo favor a narrow, low-scoring win for Walton & Hersham.
06
Qwen 3.8 Max
Walton & Hersham win
2–1
48%
FA Cup qualifying at home gives Walton & Hersham slight edge; limited data on both sides keeps confidence moderate.
07
Mistral Medium 3.5
Horsham win
1–2
60%
Horsham typically stronger at this level; FA Cup away form often decisive in tight qualifier.
08
Kimi K3
Horsham win
1–2
52%
Horsham typically compete at a higher level than Walton & Hersham, giving them a slight edge, but FA Cup qualifying ties between nearby non-league sides are often tight and low-scoring.
09
GLM 5.3
Horsham win
1–2
52%
Horsham sit a tier higher and should edge this cup tie, but early qualifying rounds are often tight, so a narrow away win with both sides scoring fits.
10
MiMo V2.5 Pro
Walton & Hersham win
2–1
52%
FA Cup qualifying often favors the home side in a tight, competitive match; a narrow home win is the most likely outcome given the venue advantage.
— Scoreline frequency

How often each scoreline showed up.

4 of 10 models settled on 1–2. The rest of the list shows where dissent still lives before kickoff.

  • 1–2
    4 models
  • 1–0
    2 models
  • 2–1
    2 models
  • 0–2
    1 model
  • 1–1
    1 model

Match overview

Looking for a today prediction on Walton & Hersham vs Horsham in FA Cup? TuringStats aggregates multiple AI scorelines into one readable page so you can see who the models favor, the mean predicted score shown in the hero (1 - 2; the frequency chart below lists the most common exact scorelines), and implied splits before kickoff.

This prediction hub is written for readers comparing betting tips-style language with transparent model votes — not a single black-box call. The headline read is Horsham win, with vote shares roughly 40% / 10% / 50% home, draw, and away (rounded).

If you are asking who will win Walton & Hersham vs Horsham, start with the consensus strip and model table, then cross-check form and injuries in Match context further down — that order keeps the strongest signals first.

— Aggregated insights

What’s moving the panel.

01
Consensus favors Horsham

50% of models lean away — the clearest cluster on this fixture before kickoff.

02
Low confidence

Mean 52% across the panel with real dispersion — compare unanimous calls vs split tickets in the model table.

03
xG tilt 1.10 vs 1.30

Derived from predicted scorelines (model means), not live match data — useful for pace vs vote-share sanity checks.

04
Match context

Expected-goals tilt and home-field rhythm (see xG on this page) usually explain whether the game stays open or compresses late.

Ask the Council about this match

Pro

10 AI models vote yes or no with this match's last-5 form, head-to-head, live status and the model picks above attached — not from memory. Then keep asking the same council follow-ups.

Confidence trend

Cumulative average confidence in table order.

First model Last model
Result check

Actual Horsham win · AI Horsham win

1X2: Miss Score: Off
— Match context

Form, history, team news.

Walton & Hersham
Last 5
L D
1 GF · 4 GA
Recent fixtures
  • Horsham 0-3 L
  • Truro City 1-1 D
Team news

No major injury updates in the current API snapshot.

Horsham
Last 5
W L
4 GF · 4 GA
Recent fixtures
  • Walton & Hersham 0-3 W
  • Chesham United 1-4 L
Team news

No major injury updates in the current API snapshot.

— Head to head

Last five meetings.

WAL 0 · D 0 · HOR 1

WAL VS HOR
0-3
AWAY WIN
Sep 19, 2026

Betting tips (AI-signal view)

Educational only — not financial advice. We summarize how the AI picks cluster so you can cross-check with your own staking plan.

  • Lean with the plurality: when 40% of models side with Walton & Hersham, treat that as the default script unless late team news breaks the assumptions.
  • Watch the draw lane at 10% — tight FA Cup games often compress toward stalemates when both midfields win the second-ball.
  • If you chase “best bets today” narratives, require alignment between the headline pick and the score-frequency table; conflicting signals usually mean thinner edge.

Odds & analysis (implied probabilities)

Implied fair percentages from the model vote share (normalized to 100%) approximate how a balanced market might price the 1X2 if it mirrored this panel — useful for odds analysis homework even though we do not quote sportsbook ticks here.

Walton & Hersham
~40%
implied lean
Draw
~10%
implied lean
Horsham
~50%
implied lean

Over / under prediction (totals)

Model-derived xG sums to 2.40 goals in expectation. A notional totals line near 2.7 is consistent with that pace (rounded for readability). If your sportsbook posts a similar number, compare juice and live team news before deciding either side of the total.

Handicap prediction (spread-style read)

When Walton & Hersham is priced as the stronger side in the model vote, a −1 handicap narrative only clears if the most common scorelines include multi-goal wins. Cross-check the score-frequency list: if tight one-goal wins dominate, Asian handicaps near pick’em or −0.5 / −0.75 splits often fit the story better than a full −1.5 sell.

BTTS prediction (both teams to score)

With combined offensive weight near 2.40 xG, a heuristic “both teams score” prior lands around 55% yes before defensive adjustments. If several top models forecast clean-sheet pathways, downgrade BTTS enthusiasm even when the raw xG sum looks juicy.

Best bet framing (consensus-led)

Our headline best bet label follows the consensus recommendation: Horsham win. Pair that with the confidence band (Low) — high dispersion across models usually argues for smaller stake or pass, even when the headline pick looks tempting for a today prediction card on social.

Explore more

Keep browsing today prediction coverage and league hubs.

Related matches

— Journal

Articles linked to these clubs or AI forecasting.

Ask multiple AIs about this match.

10 models vote yes or no with this match's last-5 form, head-to-head, live status and our model picks attached — not from memory. Then ask follow-ups to the same council.