EST 1-1 CAS · 51% SAN 0-1 SCB · 57% AME 0-2 BEş · 61% GöZ 1-0 RIZ · 53% KOR 1-0 SKB · 53% BRA 1-2 BOD · 57% SCP 1-2 189 · 58% MOD 1-1 EMP · 51% DIN 1-1 FAR · 53% SAN 1-1 BOC · 54% PAN 0-2 PAO · 63% LEC 2-0 RAD · 59% ACM 2-0 LEC · 66% MAR 1-2 PAR · 60% EST 1-1 CAS · 51% SAN 0-1 SCB · 57% AME 0-2 BEş · 61% GöZ 1-0 RIZ · 53% KOR 1-0 SKB · 53% BRA 1-2 BOD · 57% SCP 1-2 189 · 58% MOD 1-1 EMP · 51% DIN 1-1 FAR · 53% SAN 1-1 BOC · 54% PAN 0-2 PAO · 63% LEC 2-0 RAD · 59% ACM 2-0 LEC · 66% MAR 1-2 PAR · 60%
Major League Soccer · Regular Season - 26 Sep 19, 2026 · 23:30 · UTC PayPal Park, San Francisco Bay Area Not Started

San Jose Earthquakes
vs
Los Angeles FC.

Quick answer

Who will win San Jose Earthquakes vs Los Angeles FC?

10 of 10 AI models pick Los Angeles FC to win (100%). The mean predicted score is 1–2 at 56% average confidence (medium).

Consensus of independent AI models on TuringStats, updated before kickoff. Not betting advice.

Head-to-head history → San Jose Earthquakes form Los Angeles FC form

10 AI models read this match. The plurality on 1X2 leans toward Los Angeles FC (10 of 10 models). The mean predicted score (rounded from all models) is 1–2 at 56% mean confidence (Medium band) — see the strip and table below.

Who do you think will win?

Vote before kick-off and compare with AI

10 AI models · council in session Live match data · Pro

Still not sure? Ask 10 AIs at once:
“Will San Jose Earthquakes beat Los Angeles FC in their upcoming match?”

Every model votes yes or no and defends it in a sentence or two. Attach this match's last-5 form, head-to-head and the picks above so they argue from real data — then keep asking the same council follow-ups.

Ask the Council Free today · sign in with Google to convene the council
— Consensus

Where the panel lands.

Vote share across models. Read this strip first, then the line-by-line table.

San Jose Earthquakes win 0%

0 / 10 models

Draw 0%

0 / 10 models

Los Angeles FC win 100%

10 / 10 models

— Model breakdown

10 picks. Receipts attached.

Line-by-line comparison of each system’s call.

#
Model
Pick
Score
Conf.
Reasoning
01
GPT-5.6 Luna
Los Angeles FC win
2–3
58%
With no current form or H2H data supplied, LAFC’s stronger overall squad profile gives them a narrow edge, though San Jose’s PayPal Park advantage and MLS parity support a competitive, open match.
02
Claude Sonnet 5
Los Angeles FC win
1–2
56%
LAFC's squad depth and quality typically outmatch San Jose across recent seasons; road trip to Bay Area unlikely to fully offset that gap.
03
Gemini 3.8 Flash
Los Angeles FC win
1–2
58%
LAFC possesses superior attacking depth and transition threat, giving them an advantage away against an expansive San Jose side prone to defensive lapses.
04
Grok 4.6
Los Angeles FC win
1–2
52%
Thin 2026 data and no H2H. LAFC usually outclass San Jose; PayPal Park helps the Quakes score once, but LAFC’s attack should still edge a 2-1 away win.
05
DeepSeek V4 Pro
Los Angeles FC win
1–2
58%
LAFC's stronger overall quality and road resilience likely edges a San Jose side that is competitive at PayPal Park but vulnerable in transition.
06
Qwen 3.8 Max
Los Angeles FC win
0–2
52%
LAFC historically stronger squad depth and attacking quality; San Jose at home but likely outmatched in this California derby context.
07
Mistral Medium 3.5
Los Angeles FC win
0–2
62%
LAFC typically stronger attack; San Jose struggles defensively at home. Limited H2H but away side favored.
08
Kimi K3
Los Angeles FC win
1–2
52%
LAFC typically field a stronger squad and more consistent attack than San Jose, who struggle defensively at home; expect a narrow away win in a competitive match.
09
GLM 5.3
Los Angeles FC win
1–2
52%
LAFC's stronger attacking depth typically outweighs San Jose's home edge; Earthquakes concede regularly at PayPal Park, so a narrow LAFC win with both scoring fits.
10
MiMo V2.5 Pro
Los Angeles FC win
1–2
58%
LAFC typically strong on the road in MLS; San Jose's home form is inconsistent. Expect a competitive match with the visitors edging it.
— Scoreline frequency

How often each scoreline showed up.

7 of 10 models settled on 1–2. That convergence is a strong scoreline signal—many fixtures fan out wider across the panel.

  • 1–2
    7 models
  • 0–2
    2 models
  • 2–3
    1 model

Match overview

Looking for a today prediction on San Jose Earthquakes vs Los Angeles FC in Major League Soccer? TuringStats aggregates multiple AI scorelines into one readable page so you can see who the models favor, the mean predicted score shown in the hero (1 - 2; the frequency chart below lists the most common exact scorelines), and implied splits before kickoff.

This prediction hub is written for readers comparing betting tips-style language with transparent model votes — not a single black-box call. The headline read is Los Angeles FC win, with vote shares roughly 0% / 0% / 100% home, draw, and away (rounded).

If you are asking who will win San Jose Earthquakes vs Los Angeles FC, start with the consensus strip and model table, then cross-check form and injuries in Match context further down — that order keeps the strongest signals first.

— Aggregated insights

What’s moving the panel.

01
Consensus favors Los Angeles FC

100% of models lean away — the clearest cluster on this fixture before kickoff.

02
Medium confidence

Mean 56% across the panel with real dispersion — compare unanimous calls vs split tickets in the model table.

03
xG tilt 0.90 vs 2.10

Derived from predicted scorelines (model means), not live match data — useful for pace vs vote-share sanity checks.

04
Match context

Expected-goals tilt and home-field rhythm (see xG on this page) usually explain whether the game stays open or compresses late.

Ask the Council about this match

Pro

10 AI models vote yes or no with this match's last-5 form, head-to-head, live status and the model picks above attached — not from memory. Then keep asking the same council follow-ups.

Confidence trend

Cumulative average confidence in table order.

First model Last model
— Match context

Form, history, team news.

San Jose Earthquakes
Last 5
W
1 GF · 0 GA
Recent fixtures
  • Houston Dynamo 1-0 W
Team news

No major injury updates in the current API snapshot.

Los Angeles FC
Last 5
L
1 GF · 3 GA
Recent fixtures
  • Sporting Kansas City 3-1 L
Team news

No major injury updates in the current API snapshot.

Betting tips (AI-signal view)

Educational only — not financial advice. We summarize how the AI picks cluster so you can cross-check with your own staking plan.

  • Lean with the plurality: when 0% of models side with San Jose Earthquakes, treat that as the default script unless late team news breaks the assumptions.
  • Watch the draw lane at 0% — tight Major League Soccer games often compress toward stalemates when both midfields win the second-ball.
  • If you chase “best bets today” narratives, require alignment between the headline pick and the score-frequency table; conflicting signals usually mean thinner edge.

Odds & analysis (implied probabilities)

Implied fair percentages from the model vote share (normalized to 100%) approximate how a balanced market might price the 1X2 if it mirrored this panel — useful for odds analysis homework even though we do not quote sportsbook ticks here.

San Jose Earthquakes
~0%
implied lean
Draw
~0%
implied lean
Los Angeles FC
~100%
implied lean

Over / under prediction (totals)

Model-derived xG sums to 3.00 goals in expectation. A notional totals line near 3.3 is consistent with that pace (rounded for readability). If your sportsbook posts a similar number, compare juice and live team news before deciding either side of the total.

Handicap prediction (spread-style read)

When San Jose Earthquakes is priced as the stronger side in the model vote, a −1 handicap narrative only clears if the most common scorelines include multi-goal wins. Cross-check the score-frequency list: if tight one-goal wins dominate, Asian handicaps near pick’em or −0.5 / −0.75 splits often fit the story better than a full −1.5 sell.

BTTS prediction (both teams to score)

With combined offensive weight near 3.00 xG, a heuristic “both teams score” prior lands around 55% yes before defensive adjustments. If several top models forecast clean-sheet pathways, downgrade BTTS enthusiasm even when the raw xG sum looks juicy.

Best bet framing (consensus-led)

Our headline best bet label follows the consensus recommendation: Los Angeles FC win. Pair that with the confidence band (Medium) — high dispersion across models usually argues for smaller stake or pass, even when the headline pick looks tempting for a today prediction card on social.

Explore more

Keep browsing today prediction coverage and league hubs.

Related matches

— Journal

Articles linked to these clubs or AI forecasting.

Ask multiple AIs about this match.

10 models vote yes or no with this match's last-5 form, head-to-head, live status and our model picks attached — not from memory. Then ask follow-ups to the same council.