JUV 1-1 ATA · 58% OFI 1-0 AST · 53% VIB 1-2 FCN · 52% SLA 2-1 PLZ · 59% DEP 1-1 REA · 58% VIL 2-1 LEV · 62% ALM 2-0 CEL · 59% LAS 1-0 BUR · 54% CLU 2-1 GEN · 57% KAL 0-2 PAN · 63% EST 1-1 CAS · 51% SAN 0-1 SCB · 57% AME 0-2 BEş · 61% GöZ 1-0 RIZ · 53% JUV 1-1 ATA · 58% OFI 1-0 AST · 53% VIB 1-2 FCN · 52% SLA 2-1 PLZ · 59% DEP 1-1 REA · 58% VIL 2-1 LEV · 62% ALM 2-0 CEL · 59% LAS 1-0 BUR · 54% CLU 2-1 GEN · 57% KAL 0-2 PAN · 63% EST 1-1 CAS · 51% SAN 0-1 SCB · 57% AME 0-2 BEş · 61% GöZ 1-0 RIZ · 53%
FA Cup · 2nd Round Qualifying Sep 19, 2026 · 14:00 · UTC Match Finished · 90'

Pagham
vs
Hanworth Villa.

Quick answer

Who will win Pagham vs Hanworth Villa?

Final score: Pagham 0–6 Hanworth Villa. Before kickoff, 6 of 10 AI models pick Pagham to win (60%); the consensus was wrong.

Consensus of independent AI models on TuringStats, updated before kickoff. Not betting advice.

Head-to-head history → Pagham form Hanworth Villa form

10 AI models read this match. The plurality on 1X2 leans toward Pagham (6 of 10 models). The mean predicted score (rounded from all models) is 2–1 at 54% mean confidence (Low band) — see the strip and table below.

Who do you think will win?

Vote before kick-off and compare with AI

10 AI models · council in session Live match data · Pro

Still not sure? Ask 10 AIs at once:
“Will Pagham beat Hanworth Villa in their upcoming match?”

Every model votes yes or no and defends it in a sentence or two. Attach this match's last-5 form, head-to-head and the picks above so they argue from real data — then keep asking the same council follow-ups.

Ask the Council Free today · sign in with Google to convene the council
— Consensus

Where the panel lands.

Vote share across models. Read this strip first, then the line-by-line table.

Pagham win 60%

6 / 10 models

Draw 10%

1 / 10 models

Hanworth Villa win 30%

3 / 10 models

— Model breakdown

10 picks. Receipts attached.

Line-by-line comparison of each system’s call.

#
Model
Pick
Score
Conf.
Reasoning
01
GPT-5.6 Luna
Hanworth Villa win
0–2
62%
Hanworth Villa appear the stronger side on the available club context, while Pagham’s home advantage may limit the margin. With no H2H or current form data, a controlled away win is the best-supported estimate.
02
Claude Sonnet 5
Pagham win
2–1
50%
Both sides play at similar non-league levels; home advantage in an FA Cup qualifier tips a tight, competitive tie slightly toward Pagham.
03
Gemini 3.8 Flash
Hanworth Villa win
1–2
62%
Hanworth Villa play at a higher non-league tier and possess stronger overall squad depth, giving them the edge to edge out Pagham away from home.
04
Grok 4.6
Hanworth Villa win
0–1
48%
No H2H or form given. Hanworth Villa typically sit a step above Pagham; FA Cup qualifying often stays tight, so a single away goal is the best guess.
05
DeepSeek V4 Pro
Pagham win
1–0
52%
FA Cup qualifier between lower-league sides; home advantage and cup motivation favor Pagham narrowly. No H2H data, so expect a tight, low-scoring contest with a single goal likely.
06
Qwen 3.8 Max
Pagham win
1–0
48%
FA Cup 2nd Qualifying between lower non-league sides; limited data available. Home advantage and typical tight cup-tie nature favour a narrow Pagham win.
07
Mistral Medium 3.5
Draw
1–1
55%
FA Cup ties often tight; no H2H data but both sides likely balanced in lower leagues.
08
Kimi K3
Pagham win
2–1
52%
Pagham host Hanworth Villa in FA Cup qualifying; home advantage at Nyetimber Lane and Isthmian League parity suggest a narrow home win in a competitive cup tie.
09
GLM 5.3
Pagham win
2–1
52%
No H2H data and thin context; Pagham's home advantage in an early FA Cup qualifying tie gives a slight edge in a modest-scoring game.
10
MiMo V2.5 Pro
Pagham win
2–1
58%
FA Cup qualifying rounds often see narrow home wins; Pagham's venue advantage and typical lower-league scoring patterns support a close, low-scoring result.
— Scoreline frequency

How often each scoreline showed up.

4 of 10 models settled on 2–1. The rest of the list shows where dissent still lives before kickoff.

  • 2–1
    4 models
  • 1–0
    2 models
  • 0–2
    1 model
  • 1–1
    1 model
  • 0–1
    1 model
  • 1–2
    1 model

Match overview

Looking for a today prediction on Pagham vs Hanworth Villa in FA Cup? TuringStats aggregates multiple AI scorelines into one readable page so you can see who the models favor, the mean predicted score shown in the hero (2 - 1; the frequency chart below lists the most common exact scorelines), and implied splits before kickoff.

This prediction hub is written for readers comparing betting tips-style language with transparent model votes — not a single black-box call. The headline read is Pagham win, with vote shares roughly 60% / 10% / 30% home, draw, and away (rounded).

If you are asking who will win Pagham vs Hanworth Villa, start with the consensus strip and model table, then cross-check form and injuries in Match context further down — that order keeps the strongest signals first.

— Aggregated insights

What’s moving the panel.

01
Consensus favors Pagham

60% of models lean home — the clearest cluster on this fixture before kickoff.

02
Low confidence

Mean 54% across the panel with real dispersion — compare unanimous calls vs split tickets in the model table.

03
xG tilt 1.20 vs 1.00

Derived from predicted scorelines (model means), not live match data — useful for pace vs vote-share sanity checks.

04
Match context

Expected-goals tilt and home-field rhythm (see xG on this page) usually explain whether the game stays open or compresses late.

Ask the Council about this match

Pro

10 AI models vote yes or no with this match's last-5 form, head-to-head, live status and the model picks above attached — not from memory. Then keep asking the same council follow-ups.

Confidence trend

Cumulative average confidence in table order.

First model Last model
Result check

Actual Hanworth Villa win · AI Pagham win

1X2: Miss Score: Off
— Match context

Form, history, team news.

Pagham
Last 5
L
0 GF · 6 GA
Recent fixtures
  • Hanworth Villa 0-6 L
Team news

No major injury updates in the current API snapshot.

Hanworth Villa
Last 5
W L
8 GF · 3 GA
Recent fixtures
  • Pagham 0-6 W
  • Yate Town 2-3 L
Team news

No major injury updates in the current API snapshot.

— Head to head

Last five meetings.

PAG 0 · D 0 · HAN 1

PAG VS HAN
0-6
AWAY WIN
Sep 19, 2026

Betting tips (AI-signal view)

Educational only — not financial advice. We summarize how the AI picks cluster so you can cross-check with your own staking plan.

  • Lean with the plurality: when 60% of models side with Pagham, treat that as the default script unless late team news breaks the assumptions.
  • Watch the draw lane at 10% — tight FA Cup games often compress toward stalemates when both midfields win the second-ball.
  • If you chase “best bets today” narratives, require alignment between the headline pick and the score-frequency table; conflicting signals usually mean thinner edge.

Odds & analysis (implied probabilities)

Implied fair percentages from the model vote share (normalized to 100%) approximate how a balanced market might price the 1X2 if it mirrored this panel — useful for odds analysis homework even though we do not quote sportsbook ticks here.

Pagham
~60%
implied lean
Draw
~10%
implied lean
Hanworth Villa
~30%
implied lean

Over / under prediction (totals)

Model-derived xG sums to 2.20 goals in expectation. A notional totals line near 2.5 is consistent with that pace (rounded for readability). If your sportsbook posts a similar number, compare juice and live team news before deciding either side of the total.

Handicap prediction (spread-style read)

When Pagham is priced as the stronger side in the model vote, a −1 handicap narrative only clears if the most common scorelines include multi-goal wins. Cross-check the score-frequency list: if tight one-goal wins dominate, Asian handicaps near pick’em or −0.5 / −0.75 splits often fit the story better than a full −1.5 sell.

BTTS prediction (both teams to score)

With combined offensive weight near 2.20 xG, a heuristic “both teams score” prior lands around 55% yes before defensive adjustments. If several top models forecast clean-sheet pathways, downgrade BTTS enthusiasm even when the raw xG sum looks juicy.

Best bet framing (consensus-led)

Our headline best bet label follows the consensus recommendation: Pagham win. Pair that with the confidence band (Low) — high dispersion across models usually argues for smaller stake or pass, even when the headline pick looks tempting for a today prediction card on social.

Explore more

Keep browsing today prediction coverage and league hubs.

Related matches

— Journal

Articles linked to these clubs or AI forecasting.

Ask multiple AIs about this match.

10 models vote yes or no with this match's last-5 form, head-to-head, live status and our model picks attached — not from memory. Then ask follow-ups to the same council.