DEP 1-1 REA · 58% VIL 2-1 LEV · 62% ALM 2-0 CEL · 59% LAS 1-0 BUR · 54% CLU 2-1 GEN · 57% KAL 0-2 PAN · 63% EST 1-1 CAS · 51% SAN 0-1 SCB · 57% AME 0-2 BEş · 61% GöZ 1-0 RIZ · 53% KOR 1-0 SKB · 53% BRA 1-2 BOD · 57% SCP 1-2 189 · 58% MOD 1-1 EMP · 51% DEP 1-1 REA · 58% VIL 2-1 LEV · 62% ALM 2-0 CEL · 59% LAS 1-0 BUR · 54% CLU 2-1 GEN · 57% KAL 0-2 PAN · 63% EST 1-1 CAS · 51% SAN 0-1 SCB · 57% AME 0-2 BEş · 61% GöZ 1-0 RIZ · 53% KOR 1-0 SKB · 53% BRA 1-2 BOD · 57% SCP 1-2 189 · 58% MOD 1-1 EMP · 51%
UEFA Europa League · League Stage - 1 Aug 13, 2026 · 18:00 · UTC Vasil Levski National Stadium, Sofia Match Finished · 90'

CSKA Sofia
vs
Maccabi Tel Aviv.

Quick answer

Who will win CSKA Sofia vs Maccabi Tel Aviv?

Final score: CSKA Sofia 1–3 Maccabi Tel Aviv. Before kickoff, 5 of 10 AI models expect a draw (50%); the consensus was wrong.

Consensus of independent AI models on TuringStats, updated before kickoff. Not betting advice.

Head-to-head history → CSKA Sofia form Maccabi Tel Aviv form

10 AI models read this match. The plurality on 1X2 leans toward the draw (5 of 10 models). The mean predicted score (rounded from all models) is 1–1 at 57% mean confidence (Medium band) — see the strip and table below.

Who do you think will win?

Vote before kick-off and compare with AI

10 AI models · council in session Live match data · Pro

Still not sure? Ask 10 AIs at once:
“Will CSKA Sofia beat Maccabi Tel Aviv in their upcoming match?”

Every model votes yes or no and defends it in a sentence or two. Attach this match's last-5 form, head-to-head and the picks above so they argue from real data — then keep asking the same council follow-ups.

Ask the Council Free today · sign in with Google to convene the council
— Consensus

Where the panel lands.

Vote share across models. Read this strip first, then the line-by-line table.

CSKA Sofia win 40%

4 / 10 models

Draw 50%

5 / 10 models

Maccabi Tel Aviv win 10%

1 / 10 models

— Model breakdown

10 picks. Receipts attached.

Line-by-line comparison of each system’s call.

#
Model
Pick
Score
Conf.
Reasoning
01
GPT-5.6 Luna
Draw
1–1
60%
Both teams have solid defenses and similar quality, making a draw likely at this neutral venue.
02
Claude Sonnet 5
Maccabi Tel Aviv win
1–2
52%
Maccabi typically has more European qualifying experience and squad depth; tight qualifier at neutral-ish national stadium favors narrow away edge over CSKA.
03
Gemini 3.8 Flash
Draw
1–1
60%
A tight first leg in Sofia is expected. CSKA will rely on home support, but Maccabi Tel Aviv possesses enough European experience and quality to secure a valuable away draw.
04
Grok 4.6
Draw
1–1
52%
Europa League qualifier at Vasil Levski favors cautious play; Maccabi experience offsets CSKA home support, pointing to stalemate.
05
DeepSeek V4 Pro
Draw
1–1
60%
Evenly matched teams; CSKA Sofia's home advantage balanced by Maccabi Tel Aviv's European experience.
06
Qwen 3.8 Max
CSKA Sofia win
1–0
60%
CSKA Sofia has a strong home advantage at Vasil Levski National Stadium; Maccabi Tel Aviv may struggle to break through the defense.
07
Mistral Medium 3.5
CSKA Sofia win
1–0
60%
CSKA Sofia’s home advantage at Vasil Levski and defensive solidity likely edge out Maccabi Tel Aviv’s away form in a tight Europa League qualifier.
08
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
Draw
1–1
58%
Neither team has a clear edge; both have had mixed form and no H2H data to sway the prediction, so a draw seems likely.
09
Cohere Command R+ (08-2024)
CSKA Sofia win
1–0
55%
CSKA Sofia's home advantage and solid defense should see them edge a tight game, with Maccabi Tel Aviv struggling to score.
10
MiMo V2.5 Pro
CSKA Sofia win
1–0
55%
Home venue and UEFA qualifier context favor a tight, low-scoring game with CSKA Sofia edging it.
— Scoreline frequency

How often each scoreline showed up.

5 of 10 models settled on 1–1. That convergence is a strong scoreline signal—many fixtures fan out wider across the panel.

  • 1–1
    5 models
  • 1–0
    4 models
  • 1–2
    1 model

Match overview

Looking for a today prediction on CSKA Sofia vs Maccabi Tel Aviv in UEFA Europa League? TuringStats aggregates multiple AI scorelines into one readable page so you can see who the models favor, the mean predicted score shown in the hero (1 - 1; the frequency chart below lists the most common exact scorelines), and implied splits before kickoff.

This prediction hub is written for readers comparing betting tips-style language with transparent model votes — not a single black-box call. The headline read is Draw, with vote shares roughly 40% / 50% / 10% home, draw, and away (rounded).

If you are asking who will win CSKA Sofia vs Maccabi Tel Aviv, start with the consensus strip and model table, then cross-check form and injuries in Match context further down — that order keeps the strongest signals first.

— Aggregated insights

What’s moving the panel.

01
Models lean the draw

50% of models take a stalemate — cross-check score frequency and 1X2 strip before sizing.

02
Medium confidence

Mean 57% across the panel with real dispersion — compare unanimous calls vs split tickets in the model table.

03
xG tilt 1.00 vs 0.70

Derived from predicted scorelines (model means), not live match data — useful for pace vs vote-share sanity checks.

04
Match context

Expected-goals tilt and home-field rhythm (see xG on this page) usually explain whether the game stays open or compresses late.

Ask the Council about this match

Pro

10 AI models vote yes or no with this match's last-5 form, head-to-head, live status and the model picks above attached — not from memory. Then keep asking the same council follow-ups.

Confidence trend

Cumulative average confidence in table order.

First model Last model
Result check

Actual Maccabi Tel Aviv win · AI Draw

1X2: Miss Score: Off
— Match context

Form, history, team news.

CSKA Sofia
Last 5
W W L L L
7 GF · 9 GA
Recent fixtures
  • Lokomotiv Sofia 0-2 W
  • Arda Kardzhali 4-1 W
  • OFI 0-2 L
  • OFI 3-0 L
  • Maccabi Tel Aviv 1-3 L
Team news

No major injury updates in the current API snapshot.

Maccabi Tel Aviv
Last 5
W W W L W
10 GF · 6 GA
Recent fixtures
  • Maccabi Netanya 1-2 W
  • Hapoel Tel Aviv 4-1 W
  • CSKA Sofia 1-3 W
  • CSKA Sofia 0-3 L
  • Sheriff Tiraspol 1-0 W
Team news

No major injury updates in the current API snapshot.

— Head to head

Last five meetings.

CSK 1 · D 0 · MAC 1

CSK VS MAC
1-3
AWAY WIN
Aug 13, 2026
MAC VS CSK
0-3
AWAY WIN
Aug 6, 2026

Betting tips (AI-signal view)

Educational only — not financial advice. We summarize how the AI picks cluster so you can cross-check with your own staking plan.

  • Lean with the plurality: when 40% of models side with CSKA Sofia, treat that as the default script unless late team news breaks the assumptions.
  • Watch the draw lane at 50% — tight UEFA Europa League games often compress toward stalemates when both midfields win the second-ball.
  • If you chase “best bets today” narratives, require alignment between the headline pick and the score-frequency table; conflicting signals usually mean thinner edge.

Odds & analysis (implied probabilities)

Implied fair percentages from the model vote share (normalized to 100%) approximate how a balanced market might price the 1X2 if it mirrored this panel — useful for odds analysis homework even though we do not quote sportsbook ticks here.

CSKA Sofia
~40%
implied lean
Draw
~50%
implied lean
Maccabi Tel Aviv
~10%
implied lean

Over / under prediction (totals)

Model-derived xG sums to 1.70 goals in expectation. A notional totals line near 2 is consistent with that pace (rounded for readability). If your sportsbook posts a similar number, compare juice and live team news before deciding either side of the total.

Handicap prediction (spread-style read)

When CSKA Sofia is priced as the stronger side in the model vote, a −1 handicap narrative only clears if the most common scorelines include multi-goal wins. Cross-check the score-frequency list: if tight one-goal wins dominate, Asian handicaps near pick’em or −0.5 / −0.75 splits often fit the story better than a full −1.5 sell.

BTTS prediction (both teams to score)

With combined offensive weight near 1.70 xG, a heuristic “both teams score” prior lands around 55% yes before defensive adjustments. If several top models forecast clean-sheet pathways, downgrade BTTS enthusiasm even when the raw xG sum looks juicy.

Best bet framing (consensus-led)

Our headline best bet label follows the consensus recommendation: Draw. Pair that with the confidence band (Medium) — high dispersion across models usually argues for smaller stake or pass, even when the headline pick looks tempting for a today prediction card on social.

Explore more

Keep browsing today prediction coverage and league hubs.

Related matches

— Journal

Articles linked to these clubs or AI forecasting.

Ask multiple AIs about this match.

10 models vote yes or no with this match's last-5 form, head-to-head, live status and our model picks attached — not from memory. Then ask follow-ups to the same council.